EV World reports that a Singapore-based company, Horizon Energy Systems, has test flown the world’s first hydrogen powered quadracopter, a small UAV that is claimed to fly for hours, instead of the minutes a lithium battery pack would provide.
The report asks that tantalizing question for all who suffer from range anxiety, especially while in flight. “What if you could increase flying time by a factor of ten? Instead of half-an-hour, you could keep the UAV flying for five hours, and then charge it in a couple minutes time? That’s what Singapore-based Horizon Energy Systems is promising. They have developed micro fuel cells that can be fueled by three types of hydrogen storage systems from small compressed gas cylinders to ‘on-demand’ hydrogen generation chemical cartridges rated at 700 Watt-hours per kilogram (Whr/kg), significantly higher than the best lithium batteries.”
Horizon’s Hycopter micro UAV quadracopter stores 120 grams (0.26 pounds) of hydrogen in its structure, equivalent to three kilograms (6.6 pounds) of lithium batteries. According to EV World, “Since the Hycopter has less weight to lift, it can fly longer: the company claiming up to four hours of flight time.”
As noted above, Horizon Energy Systems produces three different approaches to storing H2:
- Gaseous fuel storage of compressed hydrogen. This option costs $1 per hour for 200 Watts, and offers the least system complexity if there is enough room in the airframe to accommodate the tanks.
- “On demand” hydrogen generation using liquid chemical cartridges. This option offers the same energy available but in half the volume of the tanks of compressed H2. It’s also slightly lighter and “loses” the weight of fuel as it is consumed. This, of course, would be important in a small UAV, which might weigh no more than a few pounds.
- “On demand” hydrogen generation using solid chemical cartridges. Horizon explains that there are no catalysts required, and the chemicals offer unlimited storage duration.
From their specification sheet, we see that a one kilowatt AeroStak system, complete with controller, would weight 2.25 kilograms, or 4.95 pounds. The system also requires an external 36 Volt power supply. Stack size of the 50-cell unit is 252 x 126 x 190 millimeters (9.92 x 4.96 x 7.48 inches). Advertised as “10 times lighter and smaller than other Horizon fuel cells,” how do Aerostaks stack up against lithium-ion batteries?
Your editor chose to make a 10 kW stack as a comparison unit for the Eck-Geiger lithium-ion battery pack used in many ultralight motorgliders, such as the Swift. 10 one-kW stacks could be arranged as a block about 10 x 15 x 7.5 inches, or possibly in a string that could be 100 x 5 x 7.5 inches, or in other configurations that would fit into an airframe. We’ll stick with the first arrangement, since that comes close to the Flytec’s battery module size.
Using Horizon’s ratio of 0.26 pounds of hydrogen equaling 6.6 pounds of lithium batteries (energy density unspecified), it would take about 2.16 pounds of stored H2 to equal a Flytec 100 Amp-hour battery pack weighing 25 kilograms (55 pounds), according to Flytec’s 2015 listings.
This would give over an hour’s flight, based on Gerard Thevenot’s flight across the English Channel in 2009. His La Mouette hang glider used the Eck-Geiger HPD-10 motor and consumed 550 grams, or about 1.3 pounds of hydrogen per hour. 2.16 pounds of H2 would have provided 1.66 hours of flight, a comfortable margin for that 22-mile trip.
It’s hard to judge whether the Horizon systems would give a 10-fold increase in endurance over batteries – the numbers don’t seem to indicate quite that, but the system does allow clean running, even though at this point, possibly higher operating costs than lithium batteries. Their quoted $1 per hour for 200 Watts would equal $50 per hour for the full output of a 10 kW motor.
Such stacks and their attendant hydrogen-generating systems could be used as the sole means of powering an aircraft, or possibly in conjunction with a conventional battery pack as a range extender. Depending on unit cost and availability, Horizon Energy Systems’ packs may provide an alternative worth exploring, although one may be tempted to find a cheaper fuel source.
Boeing thinks it’s worth exploring, although in a context where expenses may not be a primary concern. As these things become more common, costs will probably come down, and that will be a benefit to all of us.
I’m a bit dissapointed. Where’s the 8 year progress?
The 1kW fuell cell system weighed about 3kg in 2007:
The shown quadcopter is very, very light weight. For the extended duration to have any meaningful advantage, some payload carying capability is needed. The fuel cell and motors will probably not be able to keep up. But I must admit that it probably will outperform an comparable ultralight traditional quadcopter powered bij lithium batts for endurance.
(Editor’s Note: It may have to do with the laws of chemistry and physics. Once we have hydrogen, in whatever form we choose to package it, the energy will not exceed a certain level, just as lithium batteries have theoretical limits. Certainly, the extrapolation of larger sized fuel cells powering an ultralight looks a great deal like M. Thevenot’s trike he flew across the English Channel six years ago, and the endurance would seem to be similar.
Incidentally, check out Prop-er’s web site, http://www.rcplans.nl/catalog/index.php?cPath=26 a source for very interesting plans for “foamy” radio-controlled model aircraft at reasonable prices.)
A few thoughts:
I suspect that, eventually, fuel cells that consume hydrocarbons, delivering power to electric motors, will become the standard powerplant. Very few moving parts, quiet, efficient, reliable.
But, we’re a long way from there now.
For motorglider use, a 10kW plant is barely useful, 20kW is more like it. The weight reduction is nice, but the cost ($100/hour) is high and the fuel is even harder to come by than a long power cord (not that easy to find either, at any airport other than home). For a small airplane, 80kW is probably the minimum, and now we’re looking at $400/hour, clearly not viable although, as you say, costs will come down.
It’s possible the military will use this, driving mass production of the fuel cells. If that happens, costs will come down, but the military will push for fuel cells that can consume kerosene/jet fuel: not having to transport multiple types of fuel is a big deal for the military. Once the cost of those comes down, it will become very interesting for private aviation.